一次過答(3)

4. 移民不怕歧視嗎
COVID-19爆發後,大部分人生活節奏大亂,英美澳不乏腦殘暴力事件,被入「種族歧視」數,不少案件受害者傷勢不輕,已進入司法程序。

其實我知道有不少父母或者老闆,他們有不順意的時候,會拿孩子或者員工出氣。明明是無辜。但沒有人會說這是「種族」歧視,只是純粹拿「不會反抗的弱者」出氣而已。

中國女生在外國男人中被認為是出名「不會反抗的弱者」,所以重點不是種族,而是有一個文化圈常以「以和為貴」為藉口,害怕受傷,沒有好好培養會打贏壞人的實力,社會上缺乏據理力爭、不畏強權的形象。沒辦法啦,大家都知道這種人在某些國家會有什麼下場,有命逃出來的……都不會想回去,寧願受人「歧視」,其實只是在做出氣袋,你明的。

我已經係出生在Trump口中很自由的香港,但因為從小就是據理力爭、不畏強權的性格,多年來拒做父母的出氣袋,也不會因為怕得罪人所以指鹿為馬,所以從來都只有人說我應該很快會死,甚至連父母都想我快點死的程度(因為不想「被給麻煩」)。

你去問問那些把孩子員工當出氣袋的人為什麼夠膽這樣做?種族歧視是你祖宗為奴所以你的潛力也好不到哪裡去——因為把你和某個典型劃成同一組,所以才錯誤把某些屬性也看成是你有的。

這次的「種族歧視」的本質,其實不太一樣。在西方眼中,亞洲人(不只限中國)容許這種惹到全世界死很多人的政權去統治大國而亳無問責的意圖,根本就是弱者的表現。

民主精神的本質,是stand for your own right,每個人都是維權戰士,所以會給小孩進行能捍衛自己以及幫身邊弱者站起來的「強者教育」,知識、技藝、體能和德行都只是「自衛」的基礎工具,因此我合理相信大部分「亞洲臉孔」的確不曾接受這樣的教育,也因此不能明白就是得要大家都不會怕事,壞人才不敢惹事,實現人權才不會是夢話。

這不是個人主義——好人得夠強大,令壞人不好做,才不會搞得太張揚;好人太弱太無能,連好人自己都會受誘惑,轉個頭變成壞人,社會就天天悲劇,為求「和諧」只能不斷維穩。舊港英一派以為金融獨大就可以撐下去,令香港經濟變得非常脆弱,物流零售都不堪一撃,「國安法」於是威力大增,有人深信硬推即能「控制」香港秩序。

什麼移民會被歧視……自家政權就是看在你被虐也不敢哼一聲的份上不斷施暴,極究的歧視也。看看香港那些大唱什麼「供樓當然要捱苦,我當年都捱得好苦」的傻人……唉。新一代當然看不起這些「上了岸」的人,得閒就會罵他們兩句,你說這算不算歧視。

一班慰安婦出來說「當年我都被強姦得好慘,為什麼你不肯做妓女改善生活呢」的戲碼,魔幻極了(現實好像未發生過),但這就是香港,也是亞洲文化的映照。

我只能說,不「歧視」才怪呢。

題目 : 論文。報告。心得 - 部落格分类 : 學術文藝

tag : 心理歷史學

Watching Livestream in the middle of the night

I took a nap before Trump's live started (which was late for an hour)so I wasn't very sleepy.

The speech confirmed that many people had thought Hong Kong's success could be copied into mainland China. This is a huge misunderstanding.

People should be informed that in those days when refugees came to Hong Kong by swimming for a day was one of the key reasons why the British sovereign has benefited the city.

Many of these people are actually gifted, not only in their cognitive ability but also fitness. Hong Kong people's IQ is famously at the top of the world, therefore. The "shift" of "merely" ten marks to the right-hand side means that the "obviously smart people" (115+) can actually be the main stream "majority" when it comes to voicing themselves before the powers.

Freedom and de-facto democracy works nicely as a combo in such an environment given an elite education. The colonial government was careful not to let the democratic element be obvious in the fear of "external influence". The more intelligent portion of the population understand the "rules" and play by nicely till the handover.

The critical setups here are impossible to copy onto mainland China. I feel really sad that the intelligence of the western parties are not high enough to see that through.

China CAN prosper AND have true democracy theoretically -- if it runs itself like the US. Unfortunately, Chinese people don't like the "messy shows" that comes with such a system so I would say that until the "uneducated" elder generation die (they find everything that is noisy and messy with things come and go every second repulsive and unthinkable), there is no hope at all for China to "conform" to western expectation.

History tells us that even something as simple as the women's voting right has taken a long time (a century?) to become universal. There are things that can only be changed through time while vandalism will not accelerate the progress at all.

題目 : 香港是這樣 - 部落格分类 : 新聞報道

tag : 心理歷史學

一次過答(2)

3. 會不會開戰
人是有感情的,有不少人願意擔任要職,為的就是可以任性的那一刻。所以有很多事情都是大家一起決定的。有人覺得管治困難是由於外部勢力干擾於是很不服氣,那麼自己也成為「干擾別人的外國勢力」去反制;有人覺得打仗更符合自家利益,就不會斷挑機希望對方「配合劇本」。這種玩法的「巧合性」非常高,例如過多一年半載要逃跑的精英和外企都走了,美國就施施然宣佈自家的超級電腦演算的結果是某病毒不大可能透過自然進化,聯合一眾受害國要求中國自動接受「戰敗國」的地位,一如當年割香港那樣割中國(當然今次只會割資源,人和地應該不會要),你覺得中國會say yes?而美國到時又會沒有準備好開戰?

記得,到時還眷戀香港錢好賺又有BNO等外國護照的人,留下的全部都是人質,被捉去「改造營」(到時會說航班已無,要開戰了,不參戰就要走,外國護照的人優先撤離到內地的難民營之類)不出奇。然後各國為求救人質,不得不出戰。

你說,扮不知不就行了?不加以懲罰,就會有誰不斷炮制更厲害的病毒了。像我這種科幻小說狂心裡一早已有劇本:

例如坐飛機的一般都係精英或者中產,下次用飛機直接播毒,再設計一隻潛伏期和傳播期更長,身體好的不會很快病發,但會傳到全世界,令營養不足、有長期病的人中招,而對這班人來說這種病死亡率高,這樣很快就可以達成「全體小康」的目標。失去的產力可以大量機械化推動科創等高端產業,然後這些專利掌握在少數人手上,令貧富懸殊之後重施故技,人口就可以在半個世紀內精英化,而且戰力可以趕上世界龍頭。

所以,如果發現了不是自然產生的,你覺得可以當「看不見」嗎?

另外,除了用基改(這樣很明顯),還可以用各種「加速進化」(現代養蠱毒)。當年第一隻抗生素就用上了X光來加速進化才終於能量產的說。

題目 : 香港是這樣 - 部落格分类 : 新聞報道

tag : 心理歷史學 WWIII

Democracy as a tool of evolution

Many people had stated that democracy is a double-edged sword. People could harm themselves easily if they are not careful and diligent enough.

I consider true democracy as a tool of evolution. It is especially effective if people are divided into not very big political systems and each can make their own decisions. A country with many independent states running their own democratic systems will emerge as a strong nation where people are known to be energetic and creative.

You don't really need people for making "sensible" decisions now that we have super computers that can just learn and calculate the different possibilities. However, only people can devise, create and entertain NEW possibilities: trying out something for the first time in history, and generate novel data. If one forces people to take on their ideas, efficiency and creativity will be comprimised.

My opinion as a modeller is that true democracy (with freedom) will, at the end, makes human nature shines through many mistakes and tragedies, coming up with something that 10 centuries ago people think only heaven could have achieved.

題目 : 論文。報告。心得 - 部落格分类 : 學術文藝

tag : 心理歷史學

一次過答(1)

最近經常被不同的人問及對時政的意見,我決定一次過答。
我不是見人講人話見鬼講鬼話的傢伙,而且沒有「奶」任何一方(我這副尊容瀨任何一方都即刻有反效果,誰會乖乖讓我瀨就奇。),加上無論香港/中國出路如何這裡也不是我「宜居」的地方(我的身體對空氣質素有世衛級的要求,不然就病給你看;香港物理上不可能從中國分離,而香港的污染源主要來自內地,完。),所以給所有人的意見都一樣的,真中立是也。

沒錯,「我很愛香港,香港是我家」並不是一個中立的態度——當你真的愛一個人,你不會計算回報。但當然,自己和對方的生命同樣重要(這才是真正的平等),所以無私的犧牲只是為大局考量。愛一個地方也一樣。一個地方沒有了「人」,那個地方就不一樣了。事實上大部分人都會選擇為了家人的幸福而令別人不幸,因為這樣對「自己」的影響比較好。

1. 問國安法對法治優勢的影響

法治的優勢是相對的。香港只會是作為「中國」的門口,所以只要中國的法治和香港的法治程度一起掉下去,差距仍明顯的話,香港的價值還是有的。

2. 如果國安法的實行最後觸發幾百萬香港人陸逐移出香港,對長期經濟的影響

是好的。因為香港如果要有效運作(而不是核心資源短缺造成不能挽回的內部分裂以及怨念),只能留下四百萬人。短期就會很痛苦,因為走的大多是英文好的所謂精英,但反正暫時外國都不會如從前那樣地大量使用香港作為中國「門戶」的功能,所以相關人士不走也會失業,而且走不走都不會導致「外國資金暫時不來」的結果改變。所以這個結局已經算係Good Ending。完。

基本上走了一堆專業服務的人之後,也會有一大班服務他們的基層失業,所以能回內地老家的應該都會回,因為香港的生活指數很高而且服務性價比差(因為有實力的都會想走……)。其實只要走幾十萬的精英就可以最終減少三百萬的人口。你想想如果在香港上課不能談民主自由外國文化不同的價值觀之餘還要搞什麼愛國教育,那和內地的教育本質上的差異何在?國安法好明顯會收緊香港人使用臉書、你管等連接西方國家的網站的自由度,以「移除」外國勢力影響和方便把發佈不利統治的用戶起底,那你覺得留在地價超貴的香港有什麼用?到時錢用得快又賺得慢(因為外資少了很多),只是發洩一下,言論一過火位就被警察拉或者被辭職。完全就是抑壓到死的人生。

主流香港人一向習慣用火爆的言論(包括粗口和暴力描寫)來發洩巨大的生活壓力,因為香港的藝術發展因為高地價這個原罪幾十年都還在地上亂爬,加上體育空間缺乏(能經常行山的大多是體能資優的一群),工時全球頭幾位,覺得「不走會憋死」的人只會越來越多。

丹麥首都當年都經歷過「劏房之城」的階段,最後首都不見一半人口之後,數字並沒有再長回去。今次香港人因為SARS的恐懼,COVID-19沒有把居住條件擁擠的基層(約四百萬人口)減個五、六十萬,只是因為這隻病毒殺傷力遠遠不及SARS。下次有沒有那麼「好彩」(例如潛伏期再長多一兩星期而未病發已可以傳播,死亡率不是百分之一而是百分之三十),真是天知道。怕死的一群可不會只怕警暴,只要不能脫離擠迫居住環境的,有地方能走的,都會陸續離開。

題目 : 香港是這樣 - 部落格分类 : 新聞報道

tag : 心理歷史學

British Security

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/27/how-are-you-being-affected-by-protests-in-hong-kong

I was reading at a fishy survey run by TheGuardian when I noticed that there's something called "SecureDrop" for true anonymity and clicked on it.

Oops. Here comes "server not found". That's what I would call "British Security".

Now let's talk about why a page asking for opinion is fishy.

Firstly, it is a page called "how are you being affected by the protest". It means people who want to rant about how they are affected by the physical aftermath of the protests will come rolling in. Now talk about research practice. Click inside and you see they are asking for how these people feel "about the proposed security laws"? My face became twisted at such an uncanny setup.

Secondly, the protests are meant as a display for those who are NOT even physically in Hong Kong. They are the ones who are responsible for the recent developments in Hong Kong, even the Chief Executive of the SAR needs to obey their wishes. I would be interested in how the protests are affecting THEM. But this survey(?) is targeted at "Hong Kong people"...

Britons are known for their viciously crooked style when it comes to expressing their dislikes.

You might say I am imagining things. But look, "What do you think the proposals will mean for Hong Kong? Are you taking part in protests? How do you think you will be personally affected?"

Protesters are NOT considering what would happen to them and I am sure most of them do not CARE about the "personal consequences" because most of them are doing it "for the better of the society".

These series of questions are guiding readers OFF the street by asking them to consider their personal interests when they are obviously not doing it for themselves. Hundreds of people (at least) were detained by the police each time as far as I know. Everybody knows the risk by know.

What does it look to you?

題目 : 論文。報告。心得 - 部落格分类 : 學術文藝

tag : TheGuardian

離WWIII又近一步

港台就是本回世界級衝突的磨心。

中共從來都是那種議題一複雜,搞一會搞不定,就會開始失去耐性然後國際標準來說「打橫行」。這種人商界不少,Trump很清楚,加以利用得很盡,果然是商界老手。今回連我這個沒有「特殊渠道」收風的升斗市民也看到了。不禁嘆一口氣——我都知我這種人無論在格裡說什麼,效果其實和倪匡這種名人在報裡寫文差不多——不是說我和他的影響力一樣,而是對「歷史」產生的效果。能決定中共的反應的東西,Trump很清楚是什麼,所以這陣子美國一連串反應之快和有序,足見中共所做的事正中他下懷。

香港最慘的係其實我們如果不搞專業獨立,不用世界接受的方式(民主、自由)營運,香港的經濟因為基本開支甚巨(人工島好貴,基建很貴,其實真的有錢剩的話我真的不介意起人工島,但現在連換水管、起多幾間醫院的餘裕都沒有),基本上中國人均收入那麼少,靠「內銷」是支持不下去的。香港的經濟命脈長遠一定得從人均收入比香港人高的地方賺回來,別無他法。

你要外國人來光顧我們的本地服務,就不能要他們覺得不安全。但中共和港府不斷以國家安全為由觸碰國際客戶的底線,即是要香港斷命脈。現在香港人的共識是「玩攬炒的主力係政府和中共」,所以煽動恐佈暴力的所謂的「外國」勢力,分分鍾最大力那個就是中共的其中一個派系所為(任由擁有正規武器者以及有組織犯罪集團在鏡頭面對做出不合比例的暴力行為),然後美方努力把這種煽動的效果擴大(生果報的努力我也看到了),令中方覺得失控在即。

「香港獨立」的議題,一直都是學術討論,突然變成話題的原因,就是中共不斷破壞香港的命脈,令新一代不再信任中共——反正死路一條,自然值得放手一搏。香港發展成本高,所以做「低端」遊客生意,讓大量人流去市中心車站附近掃奶粉之類,已證實只會不斷擠壓本來已不夠用的城市空間,長遠結果係謀殺了香港的專業相關的經濟活動;不斷放只能賣奶粉做餐飲住宿幾近一世住公屋的內地人以家庭團聚為由來香港,只是令香港收不回開發的成本。連丹麥這種民主國家都不客氣地對相同情況的丹麥人說「你要家庭團聚你可以去別國,總之不能帶無法融入本國水平的家人來」,可見問題有多嚴重。不是香港人歧視內地人而是經濟規劃明顯長期多方面失誤,港府處理這些問題卻沒有效率(因為沒有真正的民主令政府一定要聆聽民意),很多時候明益內地人(包括旅客和住民),港人不遷怒中共(以及內地人)就奇。

所以說到尾香港人只要能有真民主,迫使港府有效率地處理民生問題,反共心態就會消失。

老老實實,不先成立獨立軍先砍後奏卻不斷大大聲談「獨立」,甚至找幾個人故意站在鏡頭前舉旗被拍,誰真心覺得玩分裂係這樣玩的?給我玩我會不斷擦鞋一手組識軍力埋好大量伏筆伺機一抽啦,但問題是香港有必要獨立嗎?本來一國兩制互相尊重彼此的難處的話,沒有啊。香港地勢問題發展成本高得要命,真的不是全體新生兒都基改成資優生真的無法真正獨立啊。上一代那些三個死黨落海遊八小時只剩一個上到岸的變態基因設定一早已被(聽說天生有缺憾居多)的新人口「沖淡」,香港從九七一堆精英移民然後老一輩戰神級人馬現在基本死掉/快死,就已經「沒有未來」了。剩下的有資質搞獨立的沙盤推算後續之後都不會想搞。美國一早表明不會參腳這個方向的玩意,英國更是「不要不要」的。

要獨立,除了要肯捱,還要有創新的資質——你見新一代有多少體能達標?教育制度和肓兒文化鼓勵有創意的人去磨練這方面的實戰水平?沒有這些條件,香港有一堆人只能靠所謂的「奶共」生存,那問如何可以分開。即係要好多人去等死的玩意,只會變成內耗。

在這個背景下中共完全會錯意的原由?……就是情報張羅的水平有夠低,Trump隨便一玩就完全被玩弄。這也是為什麼這一年來我的格文很「冷靜」的原因。根據人際經驗甚廣的老哥說,我是對這種玩意超有抗性的體質。但問題是中共會被玩,是不可逆的結局——他們出名不似李家誠,用人的光譜很窄,所以對外界的目光不敏感,所以注定容易被控制。

大佬你有五毛,別人就沒有了嗎?你以為你有線眼有好多隱形線人幫你收風,你以為別人就沒有大量的戲子了嗎?你以為香港學生生活上被這些不良的中港政策很多方面深深地得罪之後,還應該覺得中港可以繼續融合嗎?相反師長越維護政權,新一代作為切身的受害者越是反感,愛國教育反成煽動「國家分裂」的國際級關公笑話,Trump應該私底下把酒恥笑了好多回……

輕輕地挑撥中港關係就令中共失誤錯手一國一制,實在對太多國家有利了。如果借中國對香港不守信用且任由香港政府忽視民生搞到樓價全球第一而基層人權不斷受侵蝕(本來香港已經Tier 2了),再加上COVID-19的經濟損失為藉口,就可以證明某政權是「邪惡軸心」,於是全世界可以聯手一起干涉中國內政,能分到很多經濟好處(包括控制定價和供應的協定),對全世界本來不甚有起色的經濟將會有大大的好處。

中國人出名不懂玩民主政治而且很願意血汗,去到哪裡對既得利益者來說都是經濟良藥(但幾近永遠不會成為政治對手,甚至有些連外語都學不會),當然大家合力玩下去,到時能輸出高質難民就最好不過啦。

所以全世界一定不會阻止中國幫香港立法,因為只有先讓中國出手立了法,這個劇本才有跑下去的機會。所以對中國來說這也是一條惡法——誰受不住誘惑用這條法例來借刀清算異見分子或者排除利益衝突的,往WWIII發展的劇本就會一路跑下去了。

至於為什麼要跑WWIII的劇本?因為這樣才能刺激科技發展啊。和平的時候大家都問科研失敗率那麼高有什麼屁用,倒不如投資多個倒模式的網遊快點賺回報,搞科研的騙子多到爆(因為不怕會被軍法處死),結果上完月球之後半個世還上不到火星(聽說種菜那裡不斷卡關了<-做這種研究的人鐵定被恥笑但其實一點都不好笑),而地球快要住爆了(印尼的首都耶加達真的正在陸沉,已起了《進撃的巨人》那樣的牆在擋幾米高的海水)大家還不快快備分,就真的有什麼不妙就全人類攬炒的說。

所以歇斯底里的恐慌就的確不必,但香港的經濟長期就真的會有結構性的改變。

題目 : 香港是這樣 - 部落格分类 : 新聞報道

tag : 心理歷史學

How groups of people grow vicious

I have always enjoyed travelling different "worlds" and finding the "missing links" between "history flow". As a lot of my royal readers have known, I am totally immersed in the not-yet-canon field of "Psychohistory".

One of the important study topics would be "how groups of people grow vicious". The Zimbardo prison experiment is just the tip of iceberg.

Think about a senile group of retired people with a good life, or men with a respected job and are not responsible for "making a lot of money". These are not typical criminal profiles.

What is needed to make them vicious?

Recently I witnessed one of these "missing link" episodes and it was eye-widening:

The gist is: give them some money and ask them to think about how to spend it, and tell them more is coming.

You can see that I couldn't help poking them and wow the defense mechanism I managed to arouse was almost funny. With this "surprise money" in front of them, suddenly they don't care how people would see them or how industry ethics etc. should be upheld.

I was glad I was wearing a mask. No wonder corruption is so easy to spread, and some people are always unnecessarily vicious.

It is quite obvious that the same formula has been applied to many walks of the society to initiate vicious practices in too many circumstances -- once you have done something bad, you will be easily controlled.

If an "antidote" that works like the first antibiotics to this can be found, I think the whole human civilization will transform, just like how people managed to survive the WWII due to the invention and mass production of antibiotics.

Well but first of all, we need that special bread mould that is "accidentally" placed (well it was some leftover I am sure) beside a petri dish with growing bacteria (yeah definitely bad lab practice there).

Yeah I truly appreciate how a lot of the important history-changing discoveries are "accidents".

題目 : 論文。報告。心得 - 部落格分类 : 學術文藝

tag : 心理歷史學

[動畫新番]《書蟲下剋上》二期7-8看後感

1. 終於理解到這個系列為什麼會從網文變成動畫還有二期,連一堆外國人都肯看。明明沒有任何討觀眾好的「色情」和「暴力」,甚至連女主角也沒有正常女主有的「外貌加持」,作品畫風還是三十年前的標準。

原來這個系列描繪的東西,係文明進化相關的"missing link"。每一集都是一個"missing link"。

2. 這兩集說的是藝術普及如何能幫基層有才能的孩子向上流。不同生活形態的人之間有隔閡是正常的(生活形態、空間完全不一樣,實際上是不同的品種),但藝術可以打破彼此之間的距離,這方面我感受良多。

藝術其實並沒有「一定是這樣」的形式限制,音樂不一定是彈鋼琴,畫畫不一定是「畫出名作」。

演奏音樂,不論形式制式,都是在表現人對抽象邏輯的理解力,以及即場控制的執行力,換句話說是一種「表現潛力」的遊戲。要是智商和實行力沒去到某個水平,就僅能把別人教你做的東西重做一次出來,旁人一看都知你不理解、不能控制自己在做什麼。所以名校入場劵最近都變成「開始發育不久就要有八級程度」(注意部分不太相信證書,要你即場演奏www所以就算沒考過也沒問題,即係片中出現的正宗的玩法)。

畫面可以把美好的世界表現出來,能感動住在「地獄」裡但心裡有光的基層孩子,這些人嚮往一個美好的世界,他們非常願意為了自己吃飽穿暖之外的事情而努力,是經濟發展的好支柱、社會進步的基石(女主角為了可以專心看書結果去營運孤兒院和工房這個劇情雖然誇張,但記性好有記性好的限制,笑)。另外,對小孩子來說,一筆筆小心把心裡的世界畫出來是很需要耐性的事情,所以不要意外科學家已發現只要看看幼兒畫畫的能力就能測出將來的學能有多高。

3. 最近十年注意到香港教育界使用的課本畫功非常糟糕到有小孩向我投訴,突然明白為什麼當年我在大學(終於沒人會罵我「塗污」課本了)筆記上畫上美形的角色配圖會吸引不少男生(毒男無誤)來搭話。

你希望別人讀到書卻用醜到死的圖畫在課本上,是不想人讀好書嗎?這些出版社安什麼叵心!

是,教育資源通常都不會夠,所以要分。是不是分給有資質、有美好願景的,還是自私自利總之要威要贏的人,就是關鍵的一步。當一個人還是小孩子的時候,藝術可以令他們流露本性,師長就知道這孩子是不是該好好培養。

4. 一個社會制度的贏家如果是對醜惡無動於衷,這個國家一定會變成魔界一樣的地方。香港這些年來教育的確走錯了路,所以有很多有資質有美好願景的孩子都得不到良好的裁培,長大被譏為「廢青」,壓在社會最低層,看到在位者只顧保全自己的地位冷血待人,被迫成為憎恨社會和反對國家的人。我不知道這是不是五千年來的傳統。

如果你說這是「外國」勢力造成,我會說這個「外國」就是中共。小時候還記得因為小學校服設計很美,曾被畫成漫畫素材,結果應該是驚動了某方高層(那時香港鐵定要回歸),強制把校服變成囚衣一樣的設計,引起學生極大不滿。

我覺得那一刻我已經知到了某政權的喜好。留在香港的,都被塑造成醜惡的囚徙,從小已是被認定是「潛在罪犯」。根本不需要任何人煽動仇恨,因為牙印早己種下——對「美」沒有追求的群體應該根本沒留意到問題在哪,就像自閉症病人得罪朋友而不自知那樣——大媽舞都可以集體跳出街不害羞的種族真的天生缺少了點什麼認知能力。

5. 如果有WWIII,香港應該就是引爆點了。所以對於用高價買劏房樓一事,老實說,我不稀罕。短炒三五年就放手(高官的玩法)還好,做工奴供廿年的價值真的沒有,尤其是我這些沒有全包福利、病了兩天即刻被炒的「新時代員工」。

題目 : 論文。報告。心得 - 部落格分类 : 學術文藝

tag : 心理歷史學 本好きの下剋上

Where should we be looking at

Today people are very concerned about the new laws CCP is going to pass to "control" the situation in Hong Kong.

I have talked about my concern over the sustainability of the way Hong Kong works since years ago and talked about inevitable social unrest and our fragile situation in face of any epidemic. I am not going to repeat myself again.

IF the CCP thinks it is a lack of CCP law that had caused social unrest in Hong Kong, Hong Kong economy will not recover forever. If I am an investor, I will move out -- not because of the law, but because of LACK OF ACTION to ensure sustainable development which is needed to maintain the profit.

Quality education, one that promotes critical thinking and independent working attitudes (you don't need a leader to tell a group of people what to do -- they will sort that out themselves) is what makes MY investment profitable.

A huge group of people with critical thinking will ensure that hoaxes and scams have a difficult time running around without being exposed. Most people would not inspect a claim if doing so is "emotionally offensive". Being critical is to be able to offend yourself and challenge others.

Management cost decreases significantly if people are able to manage themselves and people are put off from trying to be a con artist knowing that they won't have an easy time.

Obviously CCP is trying to put off foreign investments into Hong Kong in order to take over, as well as putting an end to the high quality education some schools in HK have been providing all over the years.

If Hong Kong education churns out brainwashed youths which cannot be hired by international standards, the next generation will have to submit to CCP for a living for sure, because we don't have too much local primary and secondary industry to put food on the table directly.

The medics are fighting. The next professional industry to go into the battlefield will be the educators.

What the CCP doing is like: oh you have a fever, shouldn't you take some paracetamol? That will put your fever down for sure. Now will you just take some and stop the fuss?

Hong Kong people are wise enough to recognize that we are in the absolutely wrong hands.

題目 : 香港是這樣 - 部落格分类 : 新聞報道

tag : 心理歷史學

[動畫電影]《天氣之子》看後感

新海誠的特色是畫面會說話。這看起來是一種優點,但不好的一面是,那其實也是一種劇透,尤其是對我這種藝術感受力很強而且長年努力寫故事的人。

大部分人應該都明白被劇透了之後會覺得很沒趣於是沒看的感覺。所以這一套我是理智上「啊,這效果在影院裡看應該很震撼」,感性反應卻連哪間影院有得看都沒查過。

我不知到新海誠或者宮崎駿老大知不知道有這種形式的劇透。之前「發作」過的是宮崎駿的《風起了》。

因為最近很缺眠所以作為藥用看了這一套。新海誠的作品電波和我的發夢電波很接近,可以直接做REM的替代品。看完效果很好,人就好像自然睡醒然後就清醒了。

大家還記得近四十年前宮崎駿有一套《魔女宅急便》嗎?這就是新海誠同邏輯的「版本」。很巧合地兩個故事都是「女主角」在推劇情。這大概是創作者的基本電波吧?因為我也是「男角」比較會有「撃中」率的說。用看來完全不相關的故事去表達「自己」作為創作者的主觀經驗的時候,細節位尤其是感性的着眼點和正常的寫「第三身」故事是完全不一樣的。玩過這招的人只要看到別人做同樣的事,很快就會發現了。

看這類作品的時候絕對是有一種以「創作者」的身分交心的錯覺。但看完就知道為什麼新海誠那些唯美的畫面總有些什麼東西令我覺得超慘的,所以我居然家裡一張他的作品海報也不曾有過,連電腦裡也沒下過他的作品來做牆紙。

想想看音樂界有個名家的味道和這傢伙的氛囲是一樣的——蕭邦。的確,閒時沒事做別播蕭邦給我。之前試過興之所至拿蕭邦的風格認真二創了一下,結果全開沒幾秒就有聽眾突然爆哭結果我手震得要收手,之後都不敢再開那麼大(會觀察效果,差不多就該收歛那樣)了。邏輯這種東西威力就是恐佈。

至於有很多觀眾都在那裡罵劇情怎麼這樣那樣……啊這種發夢一樣的東西認真才是有病。

題目 : 論文。報告。心得 - 部落格分类 : 學術文藝

tag : 科幻 新海誠

Hong Kong, the weirdest place

Most people who have moved to other parts of the world had intensely felt that Hong Kong is really a special place.

I am born with a keen eye. I have been to other parts of the world and investigated more about this "phenomenon".

I have come to the conclusion that Hong Kong has a HIGH concentration of "abnormal" human beings.

The British leaders had noted that the generation of refugees were full of gifted people. The education system and economic dynamics were fine-tuned to bring their potential out. In the recent years, the CCP had shipped a huge group of people with special needs (evidence coming from those providing the professional services needed by these immigrants) after the handover.

Thus, Hong Kong is full of ABNORMAL people. It is normal that no known crowd-control that any school on earth could teach will work as expected on Hong Kong people. This is unfortunately making the CCP very angry and fussed.

Emergency crowd control is basically done by scaring people. But if people are either too tough to be manipulated or too hysterical to move as instructed, nothing good would follow. Those doing crowd control are trying to get their jobs done so if they can't find a way to complete their set tasks and the managing power is not yielding, those on the front lines are not going to be emotionally stable for long and tactics, if there is any, falls apart.

Worse, it is very hard to get HK people to point their fingers at each other to achieve certain political goal -- if people are largely abnormal(in very different ways) from the start, human nature states that they will be pointing their fingers at each other since a very young age. The majority simply wouldn't feel any difference and the response would be minimal. If they have been offending each other for 100 times already, what new response would you get if you poke them for the 101st time? Not much. If you try hard to get something more, everyone would see what you are up to.

To put it simply, HK people have a huge biodiversity so as a crowd, only a system that entails democracy and freedom can work out "as intended".

p.s. In a way, we should thank the CCP of shipping all the "special need" people to HK, because, well, gifted people are highly susceptible to careful manipulation because their behavior are often highly predictable (if you have the same degree of intelligence to see through their response pattern, that is) since they don't do "wrong stuffs" and so accidentally break "the plan" like normal ones often do on a whim.

題目 : 論文。報告。心得 - 部落格分类 : 學術文藝

tag : 心理歷史學

[粵語同人詞]用歌超渡靈

十多年前有一首叫"For Fruit Basket"的動畫開場曲,我雖然不很喜歡那套叫Fruit Basket的動漫作品(只看了很少),但是隔了那麼多年意外聽到,(日文)歌詞還是會從口中自然的溜出來。

而且今次同人詞也順口溜出來了(OTL看來我很愛這首歌):

日日記起當天你那笑臉
常常融化我心中的冷壁
如春風吹拂原野青蔥會再臨

實現理想須 看見 極遠
平時勤力每點會變伏筆
成爆點那一瞬間靜靜期待

將苦澀收盡往日放下躊躇地方
將傷口包紥合埋 曲聲掩蓋淚光
一心追思某夜齊聲宣誓不朽o既願祈

分分鐘追悔當日未能渴求你更多
當相識巧遇時 能去捉住路過:
請繼續伴行 結伴往

參考原曲:httpw://youtu.be/0rgJsS3Bf2Q

題目 : 歌詞抒感 - 部落格分类 : 音樂天地

tag : 水果籃子 同人詞

New group of developmentally challenged?

I think soon there will be a revolution in the global education market.

After all these years of continuous studying and teaching, I think students can be divided by two seperate types:

1. Observation type
They can learn just by observing others demonstrating a skill, or, reading instructions and examples.
They don't really need a lot of real-time following up to get them motivated or invest concentration into what they are to study.

2. Interactive type
They need strong social cues to initiate the process of learning, and this is often done by real-time interactions with tactile and emotional play. Their concentration can only be kept by constructively building the flow of instructions.

Online teaching is good with type 1 students and type 2 often fails miserably. Traditional big class lecture-based teaching is basically type 1 so it is to be predicted that a lot of these educational institutions are going to face huge revolutions in how they run, even with the COVID-19 gone.

It is the type 2 students that are of concern. They will start to exhibit typical behaviors associated to students with the developmental challenges.

Bascially speaking, most departments in the universities will gradually switch to research-based ones since current technology will enable the whole world to enroll in the best online teaching providers, and people will ask for it.

I can't see why we all shouldn't be instructed by better lecturers. It is too sad that college students often skip classes because they don't find it rewarding enough.

Since economically education will soon favor type 1 students, cultures that build on strong social interactions will soon find the highly-educated members distancing themselves from them since economically this will become less and less sustainable.

I see learning disorders or developmental challenges as modes of learning that deviate from economical models of teaching. As the matching supply dwindles due to economic return becoming more and more unsustainable, less grew up being able to support such modes of learning, finally the ones with that demand become those with "special needs" and few could cater for their prefered methods of learning.

題目 : 論文。報告。心得 - 部落格分类 : 學術文藝

tag : 心理歷史學

[新手教學]定位及擇路訓練

三小時內能完成、十公里以下的長度、吃完午飯才三十幾度高溫下上山也不會被曬焦的路段而且有卡可打是有的,當年本人係新手的時候老前輩就設計過這樣的路給我(們)練功,現在公開給「忽然上山」的人參考。(老實說我對自己的記憶力都有點吃驚……好歹是十幾年前的事的說)

這個玩法係北潭郊遊徑開始南下,接鹿湖郊遊徑往東,之後再上大枕蓋,最後落上窰巴士站。

我還記得當年我們作為菜鳥拿好了地圖指南針還是不斷中伏被教練們恥笑。

至於伏位……今時今日有GPS有手機地圖,大家可以自己試試的說。發現走錯了大不了回頭,不會有問題的。

這條路用新手的速度走,西貢吃飽上車,到麥二接麥三的位下車,算二時多開步的話,約四時前後才攻頂,前半段有蔭有風,三十幾度行也絕不算虐待,不會有很大中暑的危險。

題目 : 長跑 - 部落格分类 : 體育運動

tag : 行山

自我介紹

溫的若

Author:溫的若
人類有很多不同的屬性,有一兩種偏離正常(就當是十分之一吧)是很平常的。假設人有5種互相沒有關係的屬性,五個數值都是「正常」的機會只有一半左右。
但是如果五個數值之中,同時有三種是「不正常」的,那麼100人之中,就只有不到一人,堪稱「異界人」了。

最新文章
異界路牌
最新引用
月份存檔
最新留言
RSS連結
異界之門
加為好友

和此人成爲好友

搜尋欄
異界海關
現有人口:
2009年5月29日至今出入境總數:
異界襟章
不會吝嗇一小步
愛香港,愛民主